pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Dittmer <jdi@l4x.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Better way to write aggregates?
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:37:10 +0200
Message-ID: <444899B6.6090001@l4x.org> (raw)

Hi,

I more or less often come about the problem of aggregating a
child table counting it's different states. The cleanest solution
I've come up with so far is:

BEGIN;
CREATE TABLE parent (
	id int not null,
  	name text not null,
	UNIQUE(id)
);

CREATE TABLE child (
	name text not null,
	state int not null,
	parent int not null references parent(id)
);

CREATE VIEW parent_childs AS
SELECT
	c.parent,
	count(c.state) as childtotal,
	count(c.state) - count(nullif(c.state,1)) as childstate1,
	count(c.state) - count(nullif(c.state,2)) as childstate2,
	count(c.state) - count(nullif(c.state,3)) as childstate3
FROM child c
GROUP BY parent;

CREATE VIEW parent_view AS
SELECT p.*,
pc.*
FROM parent p
LEFT JOIN parent_childs pc ON (p.id = pc.parent);
COMMIT;

Is this the fastest way to build these aggregates (not considering
tricks with triggers, etc)? The count(state) - count(nullif(...)) looks
a bit clumsy.
I also experimented with a pgsql function to sum these up, but considered
it as not-so-nice and it also always forces a sequential scan on the
data.

Thanks for any advice,

Jan




view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <444899B6.6090001@l4x.org>
Permalink:  ../444899B6.6090001@l4x.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/444899B6.6090001@l4x.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jdi@l4x.org
  Subject: Re: Better way to write aggregates?
  In-Reply-To: <444899B6.6090001@l4x.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox