From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:02:23 -0600
Message-ID: <444F7D6F.5080909@boreham.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7096611.1146055237377.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <7096611.1146055237377.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
>The reason AMD is has held off from supporting DDR2 until now are:
>1. DDR is EOL. JEDEC is not ratifying any DDR faster than 200x2 while DDR2 standards as fast as 333x4 are likely to be ratified (note that Intel pretty much avoided DDR, leaving it to AMD, while DDR2 is Intel's main RAM technology. Guess who has more pull with JEDEC?)
>
>
>
DDR2 is to RDRAM as C# is to Java
;)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: david_list@boreham.org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
In-Reply-To: <444F7D6F.5080909@boreham.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox