pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail)) <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:25:27 -0700
Message-ID: <4460DE97.9040001@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5AF87D32-F602-4973-AA21-84E0CFEA1774@khera.org>
References: <e3pmkc$12mk$1@news.hub.org>
	<473FC220-A52C-4954-81E9-A14ED33164C2@blighty.com>
	<4460BA8B.7010600@commandprompt.com>
	<5AF87D32-F602-4973-AA21-84E0CFEA1774@khera.org>

Vivek Khera wrote:
> 
> On May 9, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>> Sorry that is an extremely misleading statement. SATA RAID is 
>> perfectly acceptable if you have a hardware raid controller with a 
>> battery backup controller.
>>
>> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard drive 
>> capacity that you will get with SATA.
> 
> Does this hold true still under heavy concurrent-write loads?  I'm 
> preparing yet another big DB server and if SATA is a better option, I'm 
> all (elephant) ears.

I didn't say better :). If you can afford, SCSI is the way to go. 
However SATA with a good controller (I am fond of the LSI 150 series) 
can provide some great performance.

I have not used, but have heard good things about Areca as well. Oh, and 
make sure they are SATA-II drives.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 


-- 

            === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
      Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
      Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                     http://www.commandprompt.com/





view thread (49+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4460DE97.9040001@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../4460DE97.9040001@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4460DE97.9040001@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, vivek@khera.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
  In-Reply-To: <4460DE97.9040001@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox