From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: JOIN with inherited table ignores indexes
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:42:25 +0200
Message-ID: <44885371.5020201@pse-consulting.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28435.1149782785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <44880CB1.90307@pse-consulting.de>
<28435.1149782785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
>
>>Any explanation for this horror?
>
>
> Existing releases aren't smart about planning joins to inheritance
> trees.
Using a view that UNIONs SELECT .. ONLY as replacement for the parent
table isn't any better. Is that improved too?
> CVS HEAD is better...
Customers like HEAD versions for production purposes :-)
Regards,
Andreas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgadmin@pse-consulting.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: JOIN with inherited table ignores indexes
In-Reply-To: <44885371.5020201@pse-consulting.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox