From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
Cc: Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail)) <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:15:29 -0700
Message-ID: <448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA6A16-AB42-440D-B5DB-BC43AE283ED8@blighty.com>
References: <1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger>
<54CA6A16-AB42-440D-B5DB-BC43AE283ED8@blighty.com>
> Empirically... postgresql built for 64 bits is marginally slower than
> that built
> for a 32 bit api on sparc. None of my customers have found 64 bit x86
> systems to be suitable for production use, yet, so I've not tested on any
> of those architectures.
Really? All of our customers are migrating to Opteron and I have many
that have been using Opteron for over 12 months happily.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, steve@blighty.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
In-Reply-To: <448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox