From: Sven Geisler <sgeisler@aeccom.com>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:52:02 +0200
Message-ID: <448EB4F2.2010105@aeccom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0B40278.26FA8%llonergan@greenplum.com>
References: <C0B40278.26FA8%llonergan@greenplum.com>
Luke,
Luke Lonergan schrieb:
> On 6/13/06 5:46 AM, "Sven Geisler" <sgeisler@aeccom.com> wrote:
>> You already get this change if you compile PostgreSQL 8.1.x in x86_64
>> (64-bit mode).
>
> I see, so I think your point with the patch is to make the 32-bit compiled
> version benefit as well.
>
Yup. I think you have to change this in the 32-bit compiled version too
if you want to compare 32-bit and 64-bit on a Opteron.
Sven.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgeisler@aeccom.com, llonergan@greenplum.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
In-Reply-To: <448EB4F2.2010105@aeccom.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox