From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Leigh Dyer <leigh@eclinic.com.au>
Cc: Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:15:06 +0200
Message-ID: <448EBA5A.8020503@pse-consulting.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606122134.07510.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger>
<33c6269f0606121926p15107d2fq9d395460269e2e53@mail.gmail.com>
<448E25FB.1080902@eclinic.com.au>
<200606122134.07510.josh@agliodbs.com>
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> In which case, why was 64-bit such a big deal?
>
We had this discussion with 16/32 bit too, back in those 286/386 times...
Not too many 16bit apps left now :-)
Regards,
Andreas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgadmin@pse-consulting.de, josh@agliodbs.com, leigh@eclinic.com.au, armtuk@gmail.com, steve@blighty.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
In-Reply-To: <448EBA5A.8020503@pse-consulting.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox