From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Dan Gorman <dgorman@hi5.com>
Cc: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:51:34 -0700
Message-ID: <4490F566.5090706@joeconway.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6A9B730A-425A-456E-9913-031B652E6227@hi5.com>
References: <9A377C54-361D-4F01-BF7A-7632FBA3453C@hi5.com>
<1150322085.31200.39.camel@archimedes>
<873be7ay8u.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
<36e682920606142214i6a6532f3k1a895a784f7b16dc@mail.gmail.com>
<6A9B730A-425A-456E-9913-031B652E6227@hi5.com>
Dan Gorman wrote:
> That makes sense. Speaking of NetApp, we're using the 3050C with 4 FC
> shelfs. Any generic advice other than the NetApp (their NFS oracle
> tuning options)
> that might be useful? (e.g. turning off snapshots)
I'm not sure if this is in the tuning advice you already have, but we
use a dedicated gigabit interface to the NetApp, with jumbo (9K) frames,
and an 8K NFS blocksize. We use this for both Oracle and Postgres when
the database resides on NetApp.
Joe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mail@joeconway.com, dgorman@hi5.com, jonah.harris@gmail.com, gsstark@mit.edu, mark.lewis@mir3.com
Subject: Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
In-Reply-To: <4490F566.5090706@joeconway.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox