From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Tim Allen <tim@proximity.com.au>
Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:02:27 +0200
Message-ID: <449BD853.7050908@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449BD6E0.10305@logix-tt.com>
References: <4491D61B.9040507@proximity.com.au>
<449BD6E0.10305@logix-tt.com>
Hi, Tim,
Seems I sent my message to fast, cut in middle of a sencence:
Markus Schaber wrote:
>> A pg_dump/pg_restore cycle reduced the total
>> database size from 81G to 36G.
> If you still have the original database around,
... can you check wether VACUUM FULL and REINDEX achieve the same effect?
Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, tim@proximity.com.au
Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
In-Reply-To: <449BD853.7050908@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox