From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed in
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:18:07 +0200
Message-ID: <44AC106F.1040304@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832802B3E203@loki.wc.globexplorer.net>
References: <7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B4E47B2@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com>
<44AB969C.6090604@logix-tt.com>
<71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832802B3E203@loki.wc.globexplorer.net>
Hi, Gregory,
Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> A sodden late night idea ... schemas don't need to have names that
> are meaningful to outsiders.
Yes, but having schema names like A34FZ37 not only qualifies for
thedailywtf.com, but also tends to produce maintainance nightmares.
And it still allows the customer to estimate the amount of customers.
> Still, the point about "political" aspects is an important one. OTH,
> schemas provide an elegant way of segregating data.
Yes, they do, and in the ASP case (where we have control over all
software that connects to PostgreSQL) we use the one schema per customer
paradigm quite successfully.
> My $0.02 (not worth what it was)
Oh, I think the're at least $0.03 cents worth. :-)
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com
Subject: Re: Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed in
In-Reply-To: <44AC106F.1040304@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox