From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:54:58 -0600
Message-ID: <44BF8B32.8020507@boreham.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003d01c6abc6$5039aff0$74304c93@eddy>
References: <003d01c6abc6$5039aff0$74304c93@eddy>
Guoping Zhang wrote:
>
>a) SERVER A to SERVER B: 0.35ms
> SERVER A to itself (Local host): 0.022ms
>
>
>
0.35ms seems rather slow. You might try investigating what's in the path.
For comparison, between two machines here (three GigE switches in the
path), I see 0.10ms RTT. Between two machines on the same switch I
get 0.08ms.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: david_list@boreham.org
Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql
In-Reply-To: <44BF8B32.8020507@boreham.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox