From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: H Hale <hhale21@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: sub select performance due to seq scans
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:32:39 +0200
Message-ID: <44D740F7.2020204@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154537296.7882.59.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <20060802121732.94126.qmail@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
<1154537296.7882.59.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
Hi, Scott and Hale,
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Make sure analyze has been run and that the statistics are fairly
> accurate.
It might also help to increase the statistics_target on the column in
question.
HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, hhale21@rogers.com
Subject: Re: sub select performance due to seq scans
In-Reply-To: <44D740F7.2020204@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox