pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Thomas F. O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>
Cc: Kenji Morishige <kenjim@juniper.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:28:14 -0700
Message-ID: <44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9EE66C7F-0B04-4472-9EBD-CD567AC9EA1D@sitening.com>
References: <20060808204354.GN29379@juniper.net>
	<44D906E1.7010405@commandprompt.com>
	<9EE66C7F-0B04-4472-9EBD-CD567AC9EA1D@sitening.com>

Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> 
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>>> I am considering a setup such as this:
>>>   - At least dual cpu (possibly with 2 cores each)
>>>   - 4GB of RAM
>>>   - 2 disk RAID 1 array for root disk
>>>   - 4 disk RAID 1+0 array for PGDATA
>>>   - 2 disk RAID 1 array for pg_xlog
>>> Does anyone know a vendor that might be able provide such setup?
> 
> Wouldn't it be preferable to put WAL on a multi-disk RAID 10 if you had 
> the opportunity? This gives you the redundancy of RAID 1 but approaches 
> the performance of RAID 0, especially as you add disks to the array. In 
> benchmarking, I've seen consistent success with this approach.

WALL is written in order so RAID 1 is usually fine. We also don't need 
journaling for WAL so the speed is even faster.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> -- 
> Thomas F. O'Connell
> Sitening, LLC
> 
> http://www.sitening.com/
> 3004B Poston Avenue
> Nashville, TN 37203-1314
> 615-469-5150 x802
> 615-469-5151 (fax)
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>               http://archives.postgresql.org
> 


-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/





view thread (27+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, tfo@sitening.com, kenjim@juniper.net
  Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
  In-Reply-To: <44D90FFE.7010807@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox