From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:59:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4513A5EF.7000201@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef06sk$1qb4$1@news.hub.org>
References: <ef06sk$1qb4$1@news.hub.org>
Try the translation ;)
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/13
On 22-9-2006 10:32 Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> A colleague pointed me to this site tomorrow:
>
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/642/13
>
> I can't read the language, so can't get a grip on what exactly the
> "benchmark" was about.
>
> Their diagrams show `Request per seconds'. What should that mean? How
> many connections PG accepted per second? So they measured the OS fork
> performance? Should that value be of any interrest? Anyone with heavy
> OLTP workload will use persistent connections or a connection pool in
> front.
>
> Do they mean TPS? That woulnd't make much sense in a CPU benchmark, as
> OLTP workload is typically limited by the disc subsystem.
>
> Can someone enlighten me what this site is about?
>
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net, light@theendofthetunnel.de
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
In-Reply-To: <4513A5EF.7000201@tweakers.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox