From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:20:45 +0200
Message-ID: <45221D5D.2020003@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efsjpk$1cb7$1@news.hub.org>
References: <efgu4v$276m$1@news.hub.org>
<1159527507.2767.294.camel@holly>
<efsjpk$1cb7$1@news.hub.org>
Hi, Carlo,
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> Trying to achieve a high level of data quality in one large project is
>> not often possible. Focus on the most critical areas of checking and get
>> that working first with acceptable performance, then layer on additional
>> checks while tuning. The complexity of the load programs you have also
>> means they are susceptible to introducing data quality problems rather
>> than removing them, so an incremental approach will also aid debugging
>> of the load suite.
>
> I couldn't agree more.
I still think that using a PL in the backend might be more performant
than having an external client, alone being the SPI interface more
efficient compared to the network serialization for external applications.
HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, stonec.register@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies
In-Reply-To: <45221D5D.2020003@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox