pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: measuring shared memory usage on Windows
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:27:24 -0600
Message-ID: <45337AAC.6060209@boreham.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7be3f35d0610160518h649c8f20pee9949a90796c346@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7be3f35d0610160418u51e4d256k15ee2a5e4ba9433@mail.gmail.com>
	<6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA357F4@algol.sollentuna.se>
	<7be3f35d0610160518h649c8f20pee9949a90796c346@mail.gmail.com>


> really makes me think that that area is just a comfortable way to
> access files on disk as memory areas; with the hope of propably better
> caching then not-memory-mapped files.

No, absolutely not. CreateFileMaping() does much the same thing
as mmap() in Unix.

> That would explain my disturbing impressions of performance of
> PostgreSQL on win32 rising when lowering shared_memory...

I don't know what your disturbing impressions are, but no it
doesn't explain them.





view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <45337AAC.6060209@boreham.org>
Permalink:  ../45337AAC.6060209@boreham.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/45337AAC.6060209@boreham.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: david_list@boreham.org, haraldarminmassa@gmail.com, mha@sollentuna.net
  Subject: Re: measuring shared memory usage on Windows
  In-Reply-To: <45337AAC.6060209@boreham.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox