From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:39:17 -0700
Message-ID: <45399665.8020505@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b42b73150610201950mc1f4163i67d3fdabb514befd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ehbi15$2mhm$1@news.hub.org>
<20061021023211.GA20508@alvh.no-ip.org>
<b42b73150610201950mc1f4163i67d3fdabb514befd@mail.gmail.com>
>> > ODBC is often blamed for this sort of thing - I have the 8.01.02
>> release
>> > dated 2006.01.31. Everything appears to be at its default setting.
>>
>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
I should note that we need to get a build out for Windows for rev 80.
Rev 80 is the one the build showing the most promise on Linux32 and 64
bit. It is also the one that reflects the performance metrics we have
been seeing.
We should have that in a week or so.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, mmoncure@gmail.com, stonec.register@sympatico.ca, alvherre@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
In-Reply-To: <45399665.8020505@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox