From: Peter Koczan <pjkoczan@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anyone using a SAN?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:17:56 -0600
Message-ID: <4544e0330802132017n4763babeuc67665bed099cee9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802140323.m1E3N4U26014@momjian.us>
References: <dcc563d10802131655qb088359xb89b6e7514920caf@mail.gmail.com>
<200802140323.m1E3N4U26014@momjian.us>
Thanks for all your input, it is very helpful. A SAN for our postgres
deployment is probably sufficient in terms of performance, because we
just don't have that much data. I'm a little concerned about needs for
user and research databases, but if a project needs a big, fast
database, it might be wise to have them shell out for DAS.
My co-workers and I are meeting with a vendor in two weeks (3Par,
specifically), and I think I have a better idea of what I should be
looking at. I'll keep you all up on the situation. Keep the ideas
coming as I still would like to know of any other important factors.
Thanks again.
Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pjkoczan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Anyone using a SAN?
In-Reply-To: <4544e0330802132017n4763babeuc67665bed099cee9@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox