From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:18:00 +0100
Message-ID: <45520338.2050804@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com>
References: <20061102160057.GA26580@oppetid.no>
<454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com>
Hi, Brian,
Brian Hurt wrote:
> So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
> benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
> problem?
For sequential read performance, use dd. Most variants of dd I've seen
output some timing information, and if not, do a "time dd
if=/your/device of=/dev/null bs=1M" on the partition.
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, bhurt@janestcapital.com
Subject: Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
In-Reply-To: <45520338.2050804@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox