From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
To: Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: File Systems Compared
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:02:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4576E982.7090201@janestcapital.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BEB285F8-0BD2-4524-BD46-B1D35E7EFBEB@clickspace.com>
References: <BEB285F8-0BD2-4524-BD46-B1D35E7EFBEB@clickspace.com>
Brian Wipf wrote:
> All tests are with bonnie++ 1.03a
Thanks for posting these tests. Now I have actual numbers to beat our
storage server provider about the head and shoulders with. Also, I
found them interesting in and of themselves.
These numbers are close enough to bus-saturation rates that I'd strongly
advise new people setting up systems to go this route over spending
money on some fancy storage area network solution- unless you need more
HD space than fits nicely in one of these raids. If reliability is a
concern, buy 2 servers and implement Sloni for failover.
Brian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: bhurt@janestcapital.com, brian@clickspace.com
Subject: Re: File Systems Compared
In-Reply-To: <4576E982.7090201@janestcapital.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox