From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: opportunity to benchmark a quad core Xeon
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:11:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4583AA4F.4020607@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612151922180.18205@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612151922180.18205@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com>
On 16-12-2006 4:24 Jeff Frost wrote:
> We can add more RAM and drives for testing purposes. Can someone
> suggest what benchmarks with what settings would be desirable to see how
> this system performs. I don't believe I've seen any postgres benchmarks
> done on a quad xeon yet.
We've done our "standard" benchmark on a dual X5355:
http://tweakers.net/reviews/661
Verdict is that for a price/performance-ratio you're better off with a
5160, but in absolute performance it does win.
Best regards,
Arjen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net, jeff@frostconsultingllc.com
Subject: Re: opportunity to benchmark a quad core Xeon
In-Reply-To: <4583AA4F.4020607@tweakers.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox