From: Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <45952587.5060603@andromeiberica.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1H0HFH-0004cw-6E@elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <45935A49.6080602@burntmail.com>
<E1H0HFH-0004cw-6E@elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Hi all,
> A= go through each query and see what work_mem needs to be for that
> query to be as RAM resident as possible. If you have enough RAM, set
> work_mem for that query that large. Remember that work_mem is =per
> query=, so queries running in parallel eat the sum of each of their
> work_mem's.
How can I know what work_mem needs a query needs?
Regards
--
Arnau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: arnaulist@andromeiberica.com
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
In-Reply-To: <45952587.5060603@andromeiberica.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox