From: Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
To: Kim <kim@myemma.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:07:23 +1100
Message-ID: <45A67CDB.1000706@pws.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45A671CD.1050706@myemma.com>
References: <45A671CD.1050706@myemma.com>
Kim wrote:
<snip>
> OS: Solaris 10
> write transactions/hr: 1.5 million
> size of pg_class: 535,226
> number of relations: 108,694
>
That is a huge pg_class. I remember some discussion recently about
problems with 8.2 and the way it scans pg_class. I also believe it's
fixed in 8.2.1. Are you running that. If not, I suggest you upgrade
and see if the fault still exists.
Regards
Russell Smith
> Thanks to all,
>
> Kim
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mr-russ@pws.com.au, kim@myemma.com
Subject: Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <45A67CDB.1000706@pws.com.au>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox