pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cesar Suga <sartre@gmail.com>
To: carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RES: Improving SQL performance
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:47:33 -0200
Message-ID: <45A6CCAC.4000207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKCEEADNAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br>
References: <PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKCEEADNAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br>

Hi, Carlos,

Wouldn't it be better if you used INT in 'codcep' in both tables (as 
CEP/ZIP numbers are [0-9]{8})? Casting as Tom Lane suggested is also a 
good alternative, yet I think it'd be much better if you used int in 
both columns.

Regards,
Cesar

Let's see the query:

SELECT ENDE.* , DEND.DESEND, DEND.USOEND, DEND.DUPEND,
               to_char('F') as NOVO,
               LOG.TIPLOG
          FROM TT_END ENDE LEFT OUTER JOIN TD_END DEND ON DEND.CODTAB = 
ENDE.TIPEND
                           LEFT OUTER JOIN TT_LOG LOG ON LOG.CODCEP = 
ENDE.CODCEP||CODLOG
         WHERE ENDE.FILCLI = '001'
           AND ENDE.CODCLI = ' 19475';
 



Carlos H. Reimer wrote:
> Yes, I do have an index on tt_log.codcep.
>
> Indexes I´ve on both tables:
>
> tt_end
> Indexes:
>     "pk_end" PRIMARY KEY, btree (filcli, codcli, codfil, numend)
>     "ak_end_numdoc" UNIQUE, btree (numdoc)
>     "i_fk_end_darc" btree (codarc, tiparc)
>     "i_fk_end_dend" btree (tipend)
>     "i_fk_end_dfil" btree (codfil)
>     "i_fk_end_dreg" btree (regiao)
>     "i_fk_end_mun" btree (codcid)
> tt_log
> Indexes:
>     "i_fk_log_bai" btree (codbai)
>     "i_lc_log_codcep" btree (codcep)
>
> Any clue?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Reimer
>
>
>   
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
>> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2007 16:31
>> Para: carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br
>> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>> Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] Improving SQL performance
>>
>>
>> "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br> writes:
>>     
>>> I know that the problem with the following SQL is the "LOG.CODCEP =
>>> ENDE.CODCEP||CODLOG" condition, but what can I
>>> do to improve the performance?
>>>       
>> Seems the problem is not using an index for tt_log.  Do you have an
>> index on tt_log.codcep?  If so, maybe you need to cast the result of
>> the concatenation to char(8) to get it to use the index.
>>
>> 			regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>   




view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <45A6CCAC.4000207@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../45A6CCAC.4000207@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/45A6CCAC.4000207@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sartre@gmail.com, carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br
  Subject: Re: RES: Improving SQL performance
  In-Reply-To: <45A6CCAC.4000207@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox