From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Schwarz, Karl <Karl.Schwarz@ngc.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: function performance vs in-line sql
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:49:41 +0000
Message-ID: <45F04CB5.4060204@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9E64800D28DF264DB32B0309B6F222D5188548@xcgny105.northgrum.com>
References: <9E64800D28DF264DB32B0309B6F222D5188548@xcgny105.northgrum.com>
Schwarz, Karl wrote:
> Is there something basic I am missing here with the use of a function. I
> am no database expert, but my assumption was that a function would give
> me better results than in-line sql.
Not necessarily. Usually it means the planner has less information to go on.
We'll need more information though - table definitions, queries, how is
the function called etc.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dev@archonet.com, Karl.Schwarz@ngc.com
Subject: Re: function performance vs in-line sql
In-Reply-To: <45F04CB5.4060204@archonet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox