pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
To: jason@ohloh.net <jason@ohloh.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:38:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74022AFF-0CB6-421C-B2D7-2A88A93C9604@ohloh.net>
References: <9C0858F5-0A48-4AF9-80FF-E4BA14F0F965@ohloh.net>
	<4613F7DC.40404@tweakers.net>
	<74022AFF-0CB6-421C-B2D7-2A88A93C9604@ohloh.net>

On 4-4-2007 21:17 jason@ohloh.net wrote:
> fwiw, I've had horrible experiences with areca drivers on linux. I've 
> found them to be unreliable when used with dual AMD64 processors  4+ GB 
> of ram. I've tried kernels 2.16 up to 2.19... intermittent yet 
> inevitable ext3 corruptions. 3ware cards, on the other hand, have been 
> rock solid.

That's the first time I hear such a thing. We have two systems (both are 
previous generation 64bit Xeon systems with 6 and 8GB memory) which run 
perfectly stable with uptimes with a ARC-1130 and 8 WD-raptor disks.

Best regards,

Arjen



view thread (91+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net>
Permalink:  ../4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: acmmailing@tweakers.net, jason@ohloh.net
  Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
  In-Reply-To: <4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox