pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: mark@mark.mielke.cc, Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Cc: jason@ohloh.net <jason@ohloh.net>
Cc: Geoff Tolley <geoff@polimetrix.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:32:09 -0700
Message-ID: <46140B49.3060205@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704042027.l34KRMI03358@momjian.us>
References: <200704042027.l34KRMI03358@momjian.us>

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:50:44AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> difference. OTOH, the SCSI discs were way less reliable than the SATA
>>>> discs, that might have been bad luck.
>>> Probably bad luck. I find that SCSI is very reliable, but I don't find 
>>> it any more reliable than SATA. That is assuming correct ventilation etc...
>> Perhaps a basic question - but why does the interface matter? :-)
>>
>> I find the subject interesting to read about - but I am having trouble
>> understanding why SATAII is technically superior or inferior to SCSI as
>> an interface, in any place that counts.
> 
> You should probably read this to learn the difference between desktop
> and enterprise-level drives:
> 
>   http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf

Problem is :), you can purchase SATA Enterprise Drives.

Joshua D. Drake




-- 

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/




view thread (91+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <46140B49.3060205@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../46140B49.3060205@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/46140B49.3060205@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, bruce@momjian.us, andreas@kostyrka.org, jason@ohloh.net, geoff@polimetrix.com
  Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
  In-Reply-To: <46140B49.3060205@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox