pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:20:28 -0700
Message-ID: <46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704071932540.28411@asgard.lang.hm>
References: <1175872847.9839.146.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<200704070235.l372ZiQ25465@momjian.us>
	<E1HaAc4-0005qC-Ol@elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704071333350.28411@asgard.lang.hm>
	<E1HaLYH-0003c6-1Y@elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704071932540.28411@asgard.lang.hm>


>>> I believe that the biggest cause for data loss from people useing the 
>>> 'cheap' drives is due to the fact that one 'cheap' drive holds the 
>>> capacity of 5 or so 'expensive' drives, and since people don't 
>>> realize this they don't realize that the time to rebuild the failed 
>>> drive onto a hot-spare is correspondingly longer.
>> Commodity HDs get 1 year warranties for the same reason enterprise HDs 
>> get 5+ year warranties: the vendor's confidence that they are not 
>> going to lose money honoring the warranty in question.
> 
> at least seagate gives 5 year warranties on their consumer drives.

Hitachi 3 years
Maxtor  3 years
Samsung 1-3 years depending on drive (but who buys samsung drives)
Seagate 5 years (300 Gig, 7200 RPM perpendicular recording... 89 bucks)
Western Digital 3-5 years depending on drive

Joshua D. Drake





-- 

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/




view thread (91+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david@lang.hm, rjpeace@earthlink.net
  Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
  In-Reply-To: <46185F7C.5070408@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox