From: Fei Liu <fei.liu@aepnetworks.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: sytem log audit/reporting and psql
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:13:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4635F99A.1040303@aepnetworks.com> (raw)
Hello group, I need to design and develop a web reporting system to let
users query/view syslog files on a unix host. For now, I am
concentrating on the authentication file that has user logon
(success/failure) and logoff records. The log file is logrotated every
week or so. My reporting system parses the log entries and put the
result into a postgresql database (I am proposing to use postgresql as
the backend). Since this deals with multi-year archive and I believe
'partitioing' is an ideal feature to handle this problem. So here is the
design scheme:
CREATE TABLE logon_success(
name varchar(32) not null,
srcip inet not null,
date date not null,
time time not null,
...
);
CREATE TABLE logon_success_yy${year}mm${month}(
CHECK (date >= DATE '$year-$month-01' AND date < DATE
'$next_year-$next_month-1')
)
INHERITS ($tname)
;
As you can see from the sample code, I am using perl to dynamically
generate children tables as I parse log files in a daily cron job
script. Once the log file is analyzed and archived in the database, I
have a simple web UI that sysadmin can select and view user logon
events. I have built a sample framework and it works so far. Keep in
mind, this reporting system is not limited to just user logon, it should
also work with system events such as services failures/startup, hardware
failures, etc
My initial testing has not shown any significant difference between a
partitioning approach and a plain (all entries in master) database
approach...
2005-01-01 | 00:27:55 | firewood | ssh | Login Successful | None | local
| user9819 | 192.168.1.31
My test was based on two artificial tables that has 1700 records per day
from 2004-02-01 to 2007-04-27, around 2 million entries that are
identical in both tables.
My test script:
echo Testing database $t1 time based
time psql -p 5583 netilla postgres << EOF
select count(date) from $t1 where date > '2005-03-01' and date <
'2006-12-11';
\q
EOF
echo Testing database $t2 time based
time psql -p 5583 netilla postgres << EOF
select count(date) from $t2 where date > '2005-03-01' and date <
'2006-12-11';
\q
EOF
Result:
./timing_test.sh
Testing database logon_test time based
count
---------
1121472
(1 row)
0.00user 0.00system 0:02.92elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+456minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Testing database logon_test2 time based
count
---------
1121472
(1 row)
0.00user 0.00system 0:02.52elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+456minor)pagefaults 0swaps
But the numbers are really not static and logon_test2 (with
partitioning) sometimes behave worse than logon_test...
Now here are my questions:
1) Should I use database to implement such a reporting system? Are there
any alternatives, architects, designs?
2) Is partitioning a good approach to speed up log query/view? The user
comment in partitioning in pgsql manual seems to indicate partitioning
may be slower than non-partitioned table under certain circumstances.
3) How to avoid repetitive log entry scanning since my cron job script
is run daily but logrotate runs weekly? This means everytime my script
will be parsing duplicate entries.
4) When parsing log files, it's quite possible that there are identical
entries, for example a user logins really fast, resulting 2 or more
identical entries..In this case can I still use primary key/index at
all? If I can, how do I design primary key or index to speed up query?
5) What are the most glaring limitations and flaws in my design?
6) What are the best approaches to analyze postgresql query performance
and how to improve postgresql query performance?
Thank you for taking time to review and answer my questions! Let me know
if I am not clear on any specific detail..
Fei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: fei.liu@aepnetworks.com
Subject: Re: sytem log audit/reporting and psql
In-Reply-To: <4635F99A.1040303@aepnetworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox