From: Dan Harris <fbsd@drivefaster.net>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 17:48:59 -0600
Message-ID: <46410C6B.8030901@drivefaster.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <868BCE5A6576F44A862F1FBBC3E14A01042559C3@ms17.mse9.exchange.ms>
References: <868BCE5A6576F44A862F1FBBC3E14A01042559C3@ms17.mse9.exchange.ms>
Orhan Aglagul wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I was trying to see how many inserts per seconds my application could
> handle on various machines.
>
>
> I read that postgres does have issues with MP Xeon (costly context
> switching). But I still think that with fsync=on 65 seconds is ridiculous.
CPU is unlikely your bottleneck.. You failed to mention anything about your I/O
setup. More details in this regard will net you better responses. However, an
archive search for insert performance will probably be worthwhile, since this
type of question is repeated about once a month.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: fbsd@drivefaster.net
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <46410C6B.8030901@drivefaster.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox