From: Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:48:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4656BEF1.4050609@bastian-voigt.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656BB5E.3000109@archonet.com>
References: <46569E6A.2060509@bastian-voigt.de>
<4656BB5E.3000109@archonet.com>
OK, I'll give that a try. What about pg_autovacuum then? Is it a problem
when two processes try to vacuum the same table in parallel? Or do I
need to deactivate autovacuum altogether?
>
> Try vacuuming every 3 minutes and see what happens.
>
(Sorry Richard, forgot to reply to the list!)
--
Bastian Voigt
Neumünstersche Straße 4
20251 Hamburg
telefon +49 - 40 - 67957171
mobil +49 - 179 - 4826359
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: post@bastian-voigt.de
Subject: Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
In-Reply-To: <4656BEF1.4050609@bastian-voigt.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox