From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
To: Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Domains versus Check Constraints
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:34:22 +0200
Message-ID: <4659B30E.5000802@kaltenbrunner.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070527155942.GN92628@nasby.net>
References: <465320B5.7050305@otg-nc.com>
<20070527155942.GN92628@nasby.net>
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:56:21PM -0400, Chander Ganesan wrote:
>> Are there any performance improvements that come from using a domain
>> over a check constraint (aside from the ease of management component)?
>
> No. Plus support for domain constraints isn't universal (plpgsql doesn't
> honor them, for example).
since 8.2 domain constraints are enforced everywhere ...
Stefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc, decibel@decibel.org, chander@otg-nc.com
Subject: Re: Domains versus Check Constraints
In-Reply-To: <4659B30E.5000802@kaltenbrunner.cc>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox