From: Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:53:16 +1000
Message-ID: <465A522C.4030701@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.tsp3u1becigqcu@apollo13>
References: <op.tsmrv71ecigqcu@apollo13>
<87hcq5l1c7.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
<op.tsp3u1becigqcu@apollo13>
> I am re-running it with other tuning, notably cost-based vacuum
> delay and less frequent checkpoints, and it is a *lot* smoother.
> These take a full night to run, so I'll post more results when I
> have usefull stuff to show.
> This has proven to be a very interesting trip to benchmarkland...
[ rather late in my reply but I had to ]
Are you tuning mysql in a similar fashion ?
--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dmagick@gmail.com, lists@peufeu.com
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
In-Reply-To: <465A522C.4030701@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox