From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Kurt Overberg <kurt@hotdogrecords.com>
Subject: Re: Weird 8.2.4 performance
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:12:52 +1200
Message-ID: <4667E834.6010101@paradise.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070607094304.GA22543@uio.no>
References: <371D1936-E96B-4865-AEEF-C82AC41C2982@hotdogrecords.com>
<20070607093527.GA22482@uio.no>
<20070607094304.GA22543@uio.no>
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:35:27AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> If that table
> doesn't fit in the cache on your Mac, you pretty much lose. From the EXPLAIN
> output, it looks like it fits very nicely in cache on your server. Thus, I
> don't think the difference is between 8.0 and 8.2, but rather your production
> server and your test machine.
>
That's a good point, however its not immediately obvious that the
production server is *not* running MacOSX Tiger (or has any more
memory)... Kurt can you post the relevant specs for the the 8.0 and 8.2
boxes?
Cheers
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: markir@paradise.net.nz, kurt@hotdogrecords.com
Subject: Re: Weird 8.2.4 performance
In-Reply-To: <4667E834.6010101@paradise.net.nz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox