pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>
To: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Cc: Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1@burntmail.com>
Cc: postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:14:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4669AA7B.7060107@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070608190025.GA23093@mark.mielke.cc>
References: <47A154B5-496C-478A-B60D-4238AF12EAC6@fastcrypt.com>
	<466987CD.7040408@burntmail.com>
	<46829B73-CF97-400B-8FA6-67A16F68BCAB@fastcrypt.com>
	<46699422.7080209@cybertec.at>
	<46699B89.4080900@commandprompt.com>
	<4669A5EF.8030805@cybertec.at>
	<20070608190025.GA23093@mark.mielke.cc>

mark@mark.mielke.cc írta:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:54:39PM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>   
>> Joshua D. Drake írta:
>>     
>>> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Dave Cramer írta:
>>>>         
>>>>> It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0
>>>>>           
>>>> Isn't that a bit old? I have a RedHat 4.2 somewhere
>>>> that was bundled with Applixware 3. :-)
>>>>         
>>> He means redhat ES/AS 4 I assume.
>>>       
>> I guessed that, hence the smiley.
>> But it's very unfortunate that version numbers
>> are reused - it can cause confusion.
>> There was a RH 4.0 already a long ago,
>> when the commercial and the community
>> version were the same. I think Microsoft
>> will avoid reusing its versions when year 2095 comes. :-)
>>     
>
> He should have written RHEL 4.0. RH 4.0 is long enough ago, though,
> that I think few would assume it meant the much older release.
>   

Yes. But up until RHEL 8.0/9.0 ( or plain 9 without decimals ;-) )
I can make cheap jokes telling that I can give you a free upgrade. :-)

> You'll find a similar thing with products like "CuteFTP 7.0" or
> "CuteFTP Pro 3.0".
>   

I am sure there are others, too. But enough of this OT,
I am really interested in the main thread's topic.

Best regards,

-- 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/




view thread (20+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4669AA7B.7060107@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../4669AA7B.7060107@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4669AA7B.7060107@cybertec.at

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: zb@cybertec.at, mark@mark.mielke.cc, jd@commandprompt.com, pg@fastcrypt.com, guyr-ml1@burntmail.com
  Subject: Re: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much
  In-Reply-To: <4669AA7B.7060107@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox