From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
Cc: christian.braun@tudor.lu
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:29:15 -0500
Message-ID: <467AFBBB.3040204@g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1182429787.17913.57482.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
References: <OF414BF8DA.327C4584-ONC12572FF.00398A72-C12572FF.00398A77@tudor.lu>
<4679A822.9030104@g2switchworks.com>
<cone.1182429787.17913.57482.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Scott Marlowe writes:
>
>> and a bit more resiliant to drive failure, RAID-5 can give you a lot
>> of storage and very good read performance, so it works well for
>> reporting /
>
> New controllers now also have Raid 6, which from the few reports I
> have seen seems to have a good compromise of performance and space.
>
Very true. And if they've gone to the trouble of implementing RAID-6,
they're usually at least halfway decent controllers.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, lists@stringsutils.com, christian.braun@tudor.lu
Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions
In-Reply-To: <467AFBBB.3040204@g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox