From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL List Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Cc: postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <46A0EAE3.7030305@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73185727-AD4A-4C97-B243-ADD2EE1875B5@decibel.org>
References: <73185727-AD4A-4C97-B243-ADD2EE1875B5@decibel.org>
Jim,
> Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL. On
that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT. I think SpecJ would show a
greater difference, but we're still focussed on benchmarks we can
publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.
--Josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, decibel@decibel.org, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
In-Reply-To: <46A0EAE3.7030305@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox