pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:40:12 +0100
Message-ID: <46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070728192713.GH19392@tils.net>
References: <200707281903.l6SJ3qs07818@pillette.com>
	<20070728192713.GH19392@tils.net>

Tilmann Singer wrote:
> * andrew@pillette.com <andrew@pillette.com> [20070728 21:05]:
>> Let's try putting the sort/limit in each piece of the UNION to speed them up separately.
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (
>>  (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>>  WHERE lt.user_id = 12345
>>  ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q1
>>  UNION
>>  (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>>  WHERE user_id IN (SELECT contact_id FROM relationships WHERE user_id=12345)
>>  ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q2
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10;
> 
> It's not possible to use ORDER BY or LIMIT within unioned queries.
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-select.html#SQL-UNION

"ORDER BY and LIMIT can be attached to a subexpression if it is enclosed in parentheses"



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org>
Permalink:  ../46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jgh@wizmail.org
  Subject: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
  In-Reply-To: <46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox