pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
Cc: 'Scott Marlowe' <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:50:34 -0700
Message-ID: <46DF6AFA.6090605@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DCCF196F82444998B33F40C97B71CA4@serenity>
References: <fbkn5d$cfq$1@news.hub.org>
	<20070904230639.GA23731@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<dcc563d10709041615s305ae98bm92dee61ab199b7c4@mail.gmail.com>
	<3DCCF196F82444998B33F40C97B71CA4@serenity>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Unfortunately, LINUX is not an option at this time. We looked into it; there
> is no *NIX expertise in the enterprise. However, I have raised this issue in
> various forums before, and when pressed no one was willing to say that "*NIX
> *DEFINITELY* outperforms Windows" for what my client is doing (or if it did
> outperform Windows, that it would outperform so significantly that it
> merited the move).
> 
> Was this incorrect? Can my client DEFINITELY expect a significant
> improvement in performance for what he is doing?
> 
> DISK subsystem reports: SCSI/RAID Smart Array E200 controller using RAID 1.
> 

Based on the hardware config you mention, it sounds to me as if you put
all your money in the wrong basket (e.g; way too much ram and cpu / not
enough IO).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG32r5ATb/zqfZUUQRAkAgAJ97aaOJZBbf8PobFjWs2v2fPh67PQCfeDVF
mU6DA7mb3XfWDlpRsOfLi0U=
=t7b9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



view thread (35+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <46DF6AFA.6090605@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../46DF6AFA.6090605@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/46DF6AFA.6090605@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, stonec.register@sympatico.ca, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, alvherre@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
  In-Reply-To: <46DF6AFA.6090605@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox