From: Gábor Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: select count(*) performance (vacuum did not help)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:14:27 +0200
Message-ID: <46F7D453.4050908@nekomancer.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F7D2C7.70105@enterprisedb.com>
References: <46F7C494.1050604@nekomancer.net>
<46F7C9F1.1080805@enterprisedb.com>
<46F7D207.3000901@nekomancer.net>
<46F7D2C7.70105@enterprisedb.com>
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Gábor Farkas wrote:
>>
>> if i do a full vacuum to that table only, will the database still serve
>> data from the other tables at a normal speed?
>
> Yes. The extra I/O load vacuum full generates while it's running might
> disrupt other activity, though.
>
i see.
will i achieve the same thing by simply dropping that table and
re-creating it?
gabor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gabor@nekomancer.net, heikki@enterprisedb.com
Subject: Re: select count(*) performance (vacuum did not help)
In-Reply-To: <46F7D453.4050908@nekomancer.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox