From: Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Jeff@PointHere.net, "'D'Arcy J.M. Cain'" <darcy@druid.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:09:48 +0200
Message-ID: <470A645C.1080405@wildenhain.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710080812110000@463712056>
References: <200710080812110000@463712056>
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
> I'd consider having a small daemon LISTENing for NOTIFYs that you send by triggers whenever the table has changed. That'll make sure it only dumps if something actually changed. And you can also implement some ratelimiting if needed.
Do you really think such a homegrown solution will be more
performant then just accessing postgres? If you have
many users the lookup time in a .htaccess/.htpasswd is not for
free either.
Regards
Tino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tino@wildenhain.de, magnus@hagander.net, darcy@druid.net
Subject: Re: Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication
In-Reply-To: <470A645C.1080405@wildenhain.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox