pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane.schildknecht@postgresqlfr.org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:50:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4714897B.7030108@postgresqlfr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47147FAA.7010909@enterprisedb.com>
References: <47147AD8.9010704@postgresqlfr.org>
	<47147FAA.7010909@enterprisedb.com>

Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
> Stéphane Schildknecht wrote:
>   
>> I wonder vacuum verbose would tell me if fsm parameters were not too
>> badly configured, but I can't get the 4 last lines of the output...
>>     
>
> Why not?
>   

I would like to know... Seems like vacuum does not want me to see these
precious line. I really don't know why.
>   
>> Whats's more, I wonder what we could monitor to get some explanation of
>> the recent time increase, and then have a quite-sure way of configuring
>> the server.
>>     
>
> sar or iostat output would be a good start, to determine if it's waiting
> for I/O or what.
>   

Ok, I'll try that.
>
> Increasing checkpoint_segments seems like a good idea then. You should
> increase checkpoint_timeout as well, 180 is just 3 minutes. How much
> concurrent activity is there in the database? 30 pg_xlog files equals
> 512 MB of WAL; that's quite a lot.
>   

I don't know exactly how far, but yes, activity is high.
> Have you changed the vacuum cost delay settings from the defaults?
>   

Not yet.


-- 
Stéphane SCHILDKNECHT
Président de PostgreSQLFr
http://www.postgresqlfr.org




view thread (20+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4714897B.7030108@postgresqlfr.org>
Permalink:  ../4714897B.7030108@postgresqlfr.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4714897B.7030108@postgresqlfr.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: stephane.schildknecht@postgresqlfr.org, heikki@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
  In-Reply-To: <4714897B.7030108@postgresqlfr.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox