From: Sebastian Hennebrueder <usenet@laliluna.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:41:19 +0100
Message-ID: <47347F9F.1070309@laliluna.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47344D43.5090506@geri.cc.fer.hr>
References: <47344D43.5090506@geri.cc.fer.hr>
>
> Among other things (FreeBSD advocacy, mostly :) ), it contains a direct
> comparison between MySQL and PostgreSQL on various platforms, with
> PostgreSQL winning!
>
Hello,
If the queries are complex, this is understable. I had a performance
review of a Hibernate project (Java Object Relation Mapping) using
MySQL. ORM produces easily "complex" queries with joins and subqueries.
MySQL uses nested loops for subqueries which lead to performance issues
with growing database size.
They state in their documentation that for version 5.2 there are
improvements planned regarding this kind of query.
Best Regards
Sebastian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: usenet@laliluna.de
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <47347F9F.1070309@laliluna.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox