From: Tim Jones <TJones@optio.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: query plans different for 8.1 on windows and aix
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:20:22 -0500
Message-ID: <47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D3033ACE@mail.optiosoftware.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am trying to perform the following type of query 'select
patientname ... from patient were patientname LIKE 'JONES%, %' order by
patientname asc limit 100'. There about 1.4 million rows in the table.
On my windows machine (2GB Ram ,3Ghz, Windows XP, 120GB Hard Drive,
postgres 8.1beta4) it takes about 150 millisecs and the query plan is
'Limit (cost=18381.90..18384.40 rows=100 width=404)'
' -> Unique (cost=18381.90..18418.62 rows=1469 width=404)'
' -> Sort (cost=18381.90..18385.57 rows=1469 width=404)'
' Sort Key: patientname, patientidentifier,
patientvipindicator, patientconfidentiality, patientmrn,
patientfacility, patientssn, patientsex, patientbirthdate'
' -> Bitmap Heap Scan on patient (cost=81.08..18304.62
rows=1469 width=404)'
' Filter: ((patientname)::text ~~ ''BILL%,
%''::text)'
' -> Bitmap Index Scan on ix_patientname
(cost=0.00..81.08 rows=7347 width=0)'
' Index Cond: (((patientname)::text >=
''BILL''::character varying) AND ((patientname)::text <
''BILM''::character varying))'
However the same query on AIX (4 1.5Ghz processors, 60GB filesystem, 4GB
Ram, postgres 8.1.2) it takes like 5 secs because the query plan just
uses sequentials scans
Limit (cost=100054251.96..100054253.41 rows=58 width=161)
-> Unique (cost=100054251.96..100054253.41 rows=58 width=161)
-> Sort (cost=100054251.96..100054252.11 rows=58 width=161)
Sort Key: patientname, patientidentifier,
patientvipindicator, patientconfidentiality, patientmrn,
patientfacility, patientssn, patientsex, patientbirthdate
-> Seq Scan on patient (cost=100000000.00..100054250.26
rows=58 width=161)
Filter: ((patientname)::text ~~ 'SMITH%,
NA%'::text)
Why is postgres using a sequential scan and not the index what
parameters do I need to adjust
thanks
Tim Jones
Optio Software
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: TJones@optio.com
Subject: Re: query plans different for 8.1 on windows and aix
In-Reply-To: <47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D3033ACE@mail.optiosoftware.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox