pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain@dalibo.com>
To: Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:41:56 +0100
Message-ID: <47691194.20102@dalibo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476908BB.5090408@stuartbishop.net>
References: <476908BB.5090408@stuartbishop.net>

Stuart Bishop a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> We are looking at upgrading our primary servers. The final boxes will have
> 128GB ram, fast disk arrays and 4 CPUs.
>
> We currently have some eval units with 8GB ram and crappy disk to let us
> benchmark CPU choice. One box has 4 3GHz dual core Opterons with 1MB cache,
> the other box ha 4 3GHz quad core Xeons with 4MB cache.
>
> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X7350  @ 2.93GHz
> cache size      : 4096 KB
> model name      : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8222 SE
> cache size      : 1024 KB
>
> I haven't had a chance to play with the hardware myself yet. The sysadmins
> have been running some benchmarks themselves though.
>
> For every non PG related benchmark they have run, the Xeon wins by around 20%.
>
> For pgbench (PG 8.2 running Ubuntu), the Opteron is getting about 6x TPS
> over the Xeon (3000+ TPS on Opteron vs ~500 on Xeon). Things get a little
> better for Xeon with PG 8.3 (570-540 TPS).
>
> Does this match what other people are seeing or expect, or have we screwed
> our benchmarks somehow?
>   
http://tweakers.net/reviews/661/7

as an example

You can travel the website for other benchs... (there are about  dual 
and quad core)

> Is this a PG specific win for Opteron, or will we see similar results with
> other DBs?
>
> Do people see wins for non-PG databases on Xeon, and are they as dramatic as
> we are seeing for PG on Opteron?
>
> With PG 8.2 and 8.3, is it still pretty much limited to 8 cores making 2 of
> the quad core Xeons redundant or detrimental?
>
> I expect we will be running this hardware for 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4. Anyone aware
> of anything that might change the landscape for 8.4?
>
>   


-- 
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

Attachments:

cedric.villemain.vcf (text/x-vcard, 278B) download begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:C=C3=A9dric Villemain n;quoted-printable:Villemain;C=C3=A9dric org:Dalibo email;internet:cedric.villemain@dalibo.com title:Consultant PostgreSQL tel;cell:+33 (0)6 74 15 56 53 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:dalibo.com version:2.1 end:vcard

view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <47691194.20102@dalibo.com>
Permalink:  ../47691194.20102@dalibo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/47691194.20102@dalibo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cedric.villemain@dalibo.com, stuart@stuartbishop.net
  Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
  In-Reply-To: <47691194.20102@dalibo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox