From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Optimising a query
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:12:08 +0000
Message-ID: <476950E8.50009@wizmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4768B4D1.1090702@reynolds.com.au>
References: <4768B4D1.1090702@reynolds.com.au>
Paul Lambert wrote:
> " -> Merge Join
> (cost=35.56..19732.91 rows=12 width=48) (actual time=0.841..2309.828
> rows=206748 loops=1)"
I'm no expert, but in the interests of learning: why is the
rows estimate so far out for this join?
Thanks,
Jeremy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jgh@wizmail.org
Subject: Re: Optimising a query
In-Reply-To: <476950E8.50009@wizmail.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox