From: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmark Data requested
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:50:35 -0500
Message-ID: <47A8CC1B.1050000@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A8C1B9.10200@enterprisedb.com>
References: <1202150236.4252.521.camel@ebony.site>
<200802051506.51581.dfontaine@hi-media.com>
<1202221496.4252.680.camel@ebony.site>
<200802051815.25800.dfontaine@hi-media.com>
<47A8C1B9.10200@enterprisedb.com>
Hi Heikki,
Is there a way such an operation can be spawned as a worker process?
Generally during such loading - which most people will do during
"offpeak" hours I expect additional CPU resources available. By
delegating such additional work to worker processes, we should be able
to capitalize on additional cores in the system.
Even if it is a single core, the mere fact that the loading process will
eventually wait for a read from the input file which cannot be
non-blocking, the OS can timeslice it well for the second process to use
those wait times for the index population work.
What do you think?
Regards,
Jignesh
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Le mardi 05 février 2008, Simon Riggs a écrit :
>>> I'll look at COPY FROM internals to make this faster. I'm looking at
>>> this now to refresh my memory; I already had some plans on the shelf.
>>
>> Maybe stealing some ideas from pg_bulkload could somewhat help here?
>>
>> http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000261/456/20060709_pg_bulkload.pdf
>>
>>
>> IIRC it's mainly about how to optimize index updating while loading
>> data, and I've heard complaints on the line "this external tool has
>> to know too much about PostgreSQL internals to be trustworthy as
>> non-core code"... so...
>
> I've been thinking of looking into that as well. The basic trick
> pg_bulkload is using is to populate the index as the data is being
> loaded. There's no fundamental reason why we couldn't do that
> internally in COPY. Triggers or constraints that access the table
> being loaded would make it impossible, but we should be able to detect
> that and fall back to what we have now.
>
> What I'm basically thinking about is to modify the indexam API of
> building a new index, so that COPY would feed the tuples to the
> indexam, instead of the indexam opening and scanning the heap. The
> b-tree indexam would spool the tuples into a tuplesort as the COPY
> progresses, and build the index from that at the end as usual.
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, heikki@enterprisedb.com, dfontaine@hi-media.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com
Subject: Re: Benchmark Data requested
In-Reply-To: <47A8CC1B.1050000@sun.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox