From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jean-Philippe Côté <jean-philippe.cote@crt.umontreal.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Extremely irregular query performance
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:23:55 -0500
Message-ID: <480.1137036235@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060111234149.05DEA384099@crt0.crt.umontreal.ca>
References: <20060111234149.05DEA384099@crt0.crt.umontreal.ca>
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Philippe_C=F4t=E9?= <jean-philippe.cote@crt.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Thanks a lot for this info, I was indeed exceeding the genetic
> optimizer's threshold. Now that it is turned off, I get
> a very stable response time of 435ms (more or less 5ms) for
> the same query. It is about three times slower than the best
> I got with the genetic optimizer on, but the overall average
> is much lower.
Hmm. It would be interesting to use EXPLAIN ANALYZE to confirm that the
plan found this way is the same as the best plan found by GEQO, and
the extra couple hundred msec is the price you pay for the exhaustive
plan search. If GEQO is managing to find a plan better than the regular
planner then we need to look into why ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jean-philippe.cote@crt.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: Extremely irregular query performance
In-Reply-To: <480.1137036235@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox