From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sun Talks about MySQL
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:35:51 -0300
Message-ID: <481278E7.9030504@timbira.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0804251942060.28069@westnet.com>
References: <480F8C2D.6010806@emproshunts.com>
<4811D1DD.9030401@otg-nc.com>
<20080425130105.GA19447@crankycanuck.ca>
<36e682920804250741p33d621f3gf35e6bdebe2e0531@mail.gmail.com>
<20080425152053.GE19447@crankycanuck.ca>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0804251942060.28069@westnet.com>
Greg Smith wrote:
> An interesting data point is they advertise a 10-15% gain in DBT2
> results. I've started thinking about a 2008 update to my "PostgreSQL vs.
> MySQL" paper that covers PG 8.3 and MySQL 5.1. I'd love to have a
> similar comparision using that same benchmark of PG8.2->PG8.3. I recall
> Heikki was doing lots of tests with DBT2 for EnterpriseDB comparing
> those two releases like that; anybody know of a good summary I could
> utilize there? I thought that was one of the benchmarks that got a
> 20-30% speedup on going to 8.3 because it really took advantage of HOT
> in particular.
>
I did some benchmarks for 8.2 and 8.3. I'll show them at PGCon in a few
weeks. But I didn't try MySQL. It would be good if someone should do
such a comparison.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: euler@timbira.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sun Talks about MySQL
In-Reply-To: <481278E7.9030504@timbira.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox