From: Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Seqscan problem
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:48:36 +0900
Message-ID: <4820FC64.9090308@dc.baikal.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13631.1210083727@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <48203D7B.2000809@dc.baikal.ru>
<13631.1210083727@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane writes:
> Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru> writes:
>
>> I've just discovered a problem with quite simple query. It's really
>> confusing me.
>> Postgresql 8.3.1, random_page_cost=1.1. All tables were analyzed before
>> query.
>>
>
> What have you got effective_cache_size set to?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
1024M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: arhipov@dc.baikal.ru, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Seqscan problem
In-Reply-To: <4820FC64.9090308@dc.baikal.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox